WASHINGTON, D.C. - It’s not uncommon for members of congress to have homes in their home district and in Washington, D.C. for work. Some argue keeping up with the costs for both homes can be pricey. The Washington Post first reported that a new reimbursement program, which was quietly approved almost two years ago, aims to help House members expense some lodging, food and incidental costs while they’re on business in Washington. But the new reimbursement program is facing criticism. Some worry the new program could be abused because it lacks transparency. 

It's no secret our nation’s capital is one of the most expensive areas to live in the US. Rent Cafe averages about 24-hundred dollars a month for a one-bedroom apartment in D.C.  

In part of a December 2022 report on modernizing congress, it outlined concerns about financial barriers that keep people from running for congress. The report states members get paid $174-thousand dollars a year, which is way above the median household income, but they also have to maintain two homes: one in their home district and one in Washington D.C. The report states members haven’t given themselves a raise since 2009 and suggested a reimbursement program as an alternative to raising their salaries.  

A recent Washington Post article revealed nearly six-million dollars from this new taxpayer-funded program reimbursed more than 300 House members to help them cover the cost of some lodging and food while they are on official business in D.C.  

Out of the 400-plus members in the House, Representative Jack Bergman (R- MI) expensed the most, totaling to $44,079. He expensed a little more than $32-thousand on lodging and nearly $12-thousand on meals and incidentals. The Washington Post calculated on average members were reimbursed about $18-thousand dollars.   

In a database from The Washington Post, it shows Rep. Nick Langworthy (R- NY) expensed a total of $8,896. $8,597 for lodging and $298 for meals and incidentals. 

Rep. Marc Molinaro (R- NY) expensed a total of $16,022. $15,619 for lodging and $403 for meals and incidentals. His office did not send an official statement but told us in part they "did want to note Rep. Molinaro is on the lower end, relative to other members of Congress. While new to Congress, similar reimbursement systems have existed for the NYS legislature for decades and are very common in public and private sectors."

Rep. Dan Meuser (R-PA) expensed $20,941. The database shows he only expensed lodging and not meals and incidentals. Matthew Hanrahan, Rep. Meuser's Communications Director, sent us this statement:

“Congressman Meuser is reviewing the report regarding the ranking of House Members‘ 2023 reimbursements. He complies with all House rules, maintains records, and routinely pays out of his own pocket for travel and living expenses. He carefully watches every dollar spent by himself and his offices. His office operating expenses have come in under budget every year since taking office, and he has returned $887,000 of taxpayer funds out of his Member budget to the Treasury since being sworn in nearly six years ago.”

But about a fourth of House members, like Rep. Mike Kelly (R- PA), did not file for any reimbursements. We asked him why.  

“I receive a salary and we always ask people you have to live within your means and you gotta be careful about that because there are other people who say we need to be supplemented,” said Rep. Kelly. “This is not a criticism of any other member of congress it's just part of who I've always been.” 

But this program is facing criticism because it does not require proof of receipts.  

“One of the ways you earn trust is by providing receipts when you have an expense,” said Noah Bookbinder, President and CEO of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). “You’re getting reimbursed for just like most of us in our jobs if we were to spend money, we have to be reimbursed. We have to show receipts that it's a legitimate expense. That's just commonsense and congress ought to have that too.” 

According to documents provided to us, the program’s administrators did not require receipts for a few reasons. One: it would reduce the significant administrative burden on the administrative staff; and two: it would minimize any potential security risks and jeopardize personally identifiable information of members. CREW believes a program like this should be more transparent. 

“I think the policy is a good one in the sense that we want regular Americans to be able to serve in congress you shouldn’t have to be a millionaire or a billionaire to serve in congress, o a program that makes it easier for people to maintain the two households they need to be able to be in congress,” said Bookbinder. “I don't think members of congress should be attacked for taking money for this program because we do want people who aren’t wealthy to take advantage of a program like this but we have also said adjustments like this are appropriate to make the program better and create more trust with the American people.” 

According to The Washington Post, the program does have some boundaries. If members own a home in the area they can’t use it to be repaid for principal or interest on their mortgages and they can only get reimbursed for days they’re here in DC or flying to DC.

Rep. Langworthy's office initially told us they would provide a comment but we have not received it yet.